Talk:ExPRESS Logistics Carrier

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

ESP vs EXPRESS edit

  • A comparison with the ESPs (what is the difference ?) would be welcome... Hektor 23:43, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
What's there to compare? ELCs are mounting points for experiments, ESPs are storage for spare parts. Apart from the fact that both are installed on the outside of ISS, they don't really have anything in common. --Derlay 22:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
afaik, ELCs are precisely going to be essentially used to store ISS parts which are too bulky to be carried by any other spacecraft than the Space Shuttle, and that's precisely why a number of them will be installed during the last missions of the Shuttle.Hektor 08:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I propose deleting the talk about ELC 5 due to the fact that it is conjecture, there is not any verifiable evidence that it is being considered in any official capacity, and also the fact that there are not enough payload attachment points on P3/S3 to accommodate both ELC-5 and AMS-02 if launched on STS-134. See: [1] and [2](Ronsmytheiii (talk) 01:34, 14 July 2008 (UTC))Reply

ESPs do not have any telemetry from the spares stored there. There is no C&DH on an ESP. The only commands are Remote Power Controller (RPC) commands to turn on heaters for the stowed items. ELCs WILL store spares (Orbital Replacement Units) as well. Those locations only have heater power. The two ExPA sites (payload sites) have operational power, heater power,and contingency heater power as well as a Payload MDM 1553 bus connection via the ExPCA. There is also the MRDL connection to the ExPCA that later gets converted to HRDL in the FCU.

Do not throw out ELC-5 just yet. ESP-3 may be moving to another location and not on the S3 PAS or P3 UCCAS site, either. ELC-5 could become a reality if they get a ride. 5 decks are made. 5 sets of avionics will be made also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wvlfen (talkcontribs) 00:50, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • Well this information about the difference will be nice in the main article instead of the discussion page. Hektor (talk) 05:51, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

But there is no mention of the ESPs (especially ESP3) in the main article, so I didn't post it there. I didn't want to derail the article. The question was asked here...so that's where I responded. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wvlfen (talkcontribs) 01:37, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Edits to planned ELC launches edit

Changed the STS-129 launch date to reflect new date; also added the current spaceflight banner to alert others that the information may change —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.157.160.13 (talk) 16:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect acronym? edit

Hi folks, was just looking at the article, and it occurs to me that I think we've got the acronym wrong; the full name, as we know, is Expedite the Processing of Experiments to the Space Station, and so I think we should be using a lowercase r, as well as a lowercase x, to produce ExPrESS - any thoughts? Colds7ream (talk) 09:46, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

No, the acronym is EXPRESS. No lowercase in any of the acronym. Been that way since 2001. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wvlfen (talkcontribs) 06:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on ExPRESS Logistics Carrier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:51, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ExPRESS Logistics Carrier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:47, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ExPRESS Logistics Carrier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply