Talk:Everyday Rewards/Archive 1

Archive 1

Untitled

The everyday rewards starts 2morrow monday 12th may in all victorian stores...i now cos i had to put up the balloons....the orange everyday rewards puta ll the cards on register hand out flyers to customers to tell em to come into 2morro to collect there cards...im dreadin it...easkin em for there cards...its gunna b like flybuys —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.110.173.165 (talk) 13:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Unrelated US program

Will move this page to Everyday Rewards (Australia) and disambiguate rather than having info for both Aus and US programs on same page - they are unrelated. Murtoa (talk) 05:49, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Disambiguation in place but lack of notable information on US program led to speedy deletion of that page. Please don't add content about the US program to these pages. Murtoa (talk) 07:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Privacy

Hello Bidgee,

You reverted a number of my edits in the past few days. A number of the same criticisms are made of loyalty cards in general on Loyalty_program#Criticism. You state that I don't have a Neutral Point Of View. I am not stating an opinion as a fact. The barcode on each Rewards Card is unique (read my sources) and transactions are tied to that ID. Registered Rewards Cards also have personal information connected to that ID (see my sources, again).

Also, please read Lack of neutrality as an excuse to delete. I have reverted your deletion and I hope others will agree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.24.101.3 (talk) 21:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

A rewards card cannot store transactions; it is just a barcode. Woolworths has to store at least some information about each transaction, because it is used at Caltex fuel stations when over $30 is spent (in a transaction). But is knowing this even necessary? Because once a customer gives their ID to Woolworths, their systems already have everything they need to link that customer's personal information to the that transaction. The issue is not that the data may (or may not) be stored, but collected in the first place. 203.24.101.3 (talk) 23:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

, that is your own opinion and research. Bidgee (talk) 23:21, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

[1] Straight from the Information privacy page. Do we really need to argue what "information privacy" is in a privacy section of a page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.24.101.2 (talk) 23:36, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Seattlepi states nothing about ER. You're clearly doing OR by using sources that have no connection to ER and using ER's site to make your POV point. Bidgee (talk) 23:48, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

No, it doesn't mention ER. It mentions information privacy, which is what you are arguing. You are arguing that collection of data is not a privacy issue, are you not? 203.24.101.3 (talk) 23:50, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Where did I state that? I'm stating to you that you will need a source that states ER stores purchase/transaction history and that it's a privacy issue (it needs to be one source that states it and your OR with cited sources that has no connection). Bidgee (talk) 03:06, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

One of the links I provided already says that:

Use our online customer self-service to check your account balance, available credit, view your monthly repayment amount due, transaction history, pay bills and view your rewards.

[2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.24.101.2 (talk) 04:52, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

I do think you need a source which demonstrates the link with privacy issues. At the moment I think that's not the case. Murtoa (talk) 10:48, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Agreed I removed this years ago, since crikey is hardly a good source, and the article in question is mostly about profit increases. The article was also written when the loyalty card had only just been released, and mentions a concern that customers would be forced to use the card to gain the fuel discount (which 5 years later is not the case). In the case of the similar flybuys program, flybuys was opening the data to third parties. I think that to keep this section in, it must read something like "Like most loyalty card systems, ERD has been criticised for its potential privacy concerns" and it needs to be better sourced (not a blog post talking about something else). Without these changes it sounds like ORSmalltime0 (talk) 09:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

QANTAS Frequent Flyer Program

Need to add information about the new joint venture with QANTAS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crictv69 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Added long ago, but ceasing as of 1 January 2016! [3] 220 of ^Borg 03:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Woolworths Rewards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090519232304/http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au:80/business/story/0,28124,24789490-643,00.html to http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/business/story/0,28124,24789490-643,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:11, 23 January 2016 (UTC)