Talk:Everybody Saves Father and The Only Girl in Camp
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Jaguar in topic GA Review
 | Everybody Saves Father and The Only Girl in Camp has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 1, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Stills
editI believe the Thanhouser stills are not in the January 7 edition of the MPW because the front is damaged from the Archive.org back up. The typical placement of stills suggest that another undamaged copy would contain the still. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:53, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Everybody Saves Father and The Only Girl in Camp/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:02, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
The sweep is now complete. JAGUAR 22:02, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.
Checking against the GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
- I would recommend splitting the lead into two paragraphs to make the lead more balanced, per WP:LEAD
- Nothing on the Production in the lead, despite the section being scarce the lead must summarise, even if it's minor
- The plot summary in the lead is quite extensive
- Is the list of people in the production sentence a definite list of people who worked on the film? The lead says otherwise
- The names in the Cast section are not in the lead
- The original story must be linked
- "but a four suitor has wed" - have no idea what this means
- Is there a citation for the eBay selling?
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- The assertions regarding the cameramen could be original research, but both candidates are included in the reference given.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Another well researched article that has nothing to make it be put on hold. Passing 
JAGUAR 10:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)