Talk:Evelyn Cheesman

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Evelyn Cheesman's Blue Orchid discovery. edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Just wanted to flag up this significant article from Kew Science (Feb 2014) on the discovery of a herbarium specimen of a species of Dendrobium orchid which someone with more time than me might wish to incorporate into Evelyn Cheesman's article. [1] Parkywiki (talk) 01:38, 23 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Original Research ? edit

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This statement...

"The tree frog is interesting in that the herpetologist who described it, has used the masculine genitive ending 'i' instead of the feminine 'ae', showing an assumption that the collector must have been a man."

...might well be correct, but it seems to be speculation by the writer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.144.220.131 (talk) 03:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic