Talk:Essential infimum and essential supremum

Equivalent Characterization

I will add the equivalent characterization in terms of functions g = f a.e. as soon as my dumb ass can reprove the equivalence.--128.171.31.11 (talk) 13:36, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Values in C?

Maybe a remark that this is not defined for functions with values in ℂ ? or is it? Noix07 (talk) 10:37, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Requested move 27 February 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 13:08, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

---

Essential supremum and essential infimum → Essential infimum and essential supremum – For consistency with Infimum and supremum. This is both the alphabetical order and the order from smaller to greater. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:53, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

• Support Makes sense to me. ~ HAL333 00:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

In terms of p-norms

Is there a standard definition for essential supremum along the lines of the definition of L^∞(x, y) (supremum norm) as lim_p→+∞ L^p(x, y)? If you know of it, would you add it? 66.194.253.20 (talk) 19:18, 15 September 2023 (UTC)