Talk:Ernst Degner

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

On original research edit

The circumstances of a death (mysterious) and the cause of death (heart attack, perhaps) are two different things. This is one reason why we rely mainly on secondary sources to interpret the meaning of events, rather than finding our own conclusions based on our opinions of what a primary document such a a death certificate says. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:30, 20 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Here's my suggestion to Ray Battersby (who should really sign on as a Wiki editor). I had my own troubles with the 'no original research' clause, which can really crimp an author's style, especially when combined with the 'no conflicts of interest' clause! Two suggestions; 1. publish your materials online - the interviews and revisions of incorrect history, with all the data/photos you have to back up your research. 2. patience - contact a sympathetic wiki editor (Denis or myself for example), note that the materials are published, and that you feel a revision to the Degner/Suzuki story is in order. That usually does the trick - we like the truth as much as you do. On a personal note, it's long been the scuttlebutt in classic racing circles that the oft-repeated Degner tales included an awful lot of conjecture and dramatic license on the part of 'journalists' who ought to know better. A scandal really, but that's no surprise - drama sells! Vintagent (talk). —Preceding undated comment added 18:25, 26 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Conflicting versions of history edit

Re: the discussion over at User_talk:Dennis_Bratland#Ernst_Degner...

This article should be expanded to comprehensively review the conflicting versions of Degner's life and particular the circumstances of his death. The book Stealing Speed by Mat Oxley, and other sources [1][2] suggest a mysterious, violent death, while Roy Battersby's Team Suzuki contradicts the sensational account, saying he died naturally of a heart attack.

At the moment I don't see an obvious way for us to decide which sources to believe, and so we should instead do our best to describe the points of disagreement in as neutral a way possible. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 06:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ernst Degner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:57, 26 December 2016 (UTC)Reply