Talk:Emeric Essex Vidal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Military history: Maritime

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force

Notice of intent to rewrite

This Article is good and useful, for it is about a watercolourist who is unjustly neglected in his native country. However (1) it needs to be written in standard English, not mistranslated from Spanish (a marinero is not a "marine", for example); (2) it needs better sources; (3) it needs more thorough biographical details; and (4) as it stands it is too Buenos-Aires-centric. If anyone wants to collaborate on the task, I have the sources already. Ttocserp 15:10, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Rewritten October 2019

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Nobody else being interested in collaborating, I've rewritten the entire article as per above criteria. I removed the infobox but another editor has restored it. In my judgement it adds nothing to the article, but detracts from it. The existing information is trivial, or wrong. The illustration duplicates an image in the body of the article (and in lower grade too), and is artistically inept because it detracts from the main and much better image. These are editorial judgements requiring mature consideration and nobody has dicussed an alternative point of view. So, unless there is a diferent consensus, I'm going to remove it by and by.Ttocserp (talk) 03:46, 24 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Removed infobox

Nemini contradicente. Ttocserp (talk) 11:45, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic