Talk:Elliot Abravanel

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

{{movenotice|The Body Type Program}}

Pared down, unsupported medical claims removed edit

This article read like a promotional flyer for "The Body Type Program". I removed wholesale a section on Body Type Characteristics it was completely unsourced and contained claims that would need support by WP:MEDRS. I added qualifiers to the claims in the second section and included the statement by Gittleman. Further editing is needed, at this point I am having difficulty finding any serious discussion of "The Body Type Program" or RS coverage of Abravanel. - - MrBill3 (talk) 20:21, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Can we get some science in here? edit

The wife got a flyer in the pennysaver talking about this stuff. My default assumption is something might be woo so I'll go online to research it. Mainly woo sites are talking about it so I'd like to find out a bit more. I'm assuming this is like alkaline water. But I don't want to dismiss out of hand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.132.104.241 (talk) 17:52, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elliot Abravanel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply