Concerns edit

The data are four years old and portray Québec's economy more positively than recent facts permit.

This article doesn't seem to be written neutrally. While Quebec has a strong economy, this article seems to mention mostly positive points without analysis, as if it were a marketing pamphlet. More comparison to the economies of other Canadian provinces and the US would be useful. A reader of this article might wonder how the economy of Quebec is affected by the possibility of separation, if this can be written in a balanced way.

Comparison with other provinces of Canada, US states, and other countries are welcomed if you have numbers. True, there is no analysis, which cannot be written neutrally anyway. The figures given are indeed showing mostly the positive aspects of Quebec's economy. People are free to write on the weak points of Quebec's economy, which are often weak points of Canada's economy (such as the dependency on the US market for exports, the value of the Canadian dollar, the size of the interior market, the productivity not as high as it could be etc.).
As for the impact of Canada's political instability on its economy (and more specifically that of Quebec), well that's a pretty interesting topic, but there simply is no way to write anything "neutral" on it. The only figures we have I guess are that of the fluctuations in the value of the Canadian dollar during the 1980 and 1995 referendum campaigns. There's hardly anymore material than this, the rest being totally biased because the only studies we have were conceived to either scare Quebecers with a doomsday scenario or reassure them by showing them the most positive prospects. -- Mathieugp 16:56, 26 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Agriculture? edit

Where is the section quebec agriculture? Quebec has the largest number of dairy cows, pigs and sheep in canada, I'd say that's a pretty important section to have? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.134.234.90 (talk) 14:18, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Just constructed a subsection from the main article, all uncited. Go ahead and add livestock. Be nice to have a citation though! Student7 (talk) 15:59, 5 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Billions and billions edit

An unregistered editor tried to change one decimal items from "billions" to millions, then realized it should be changed back. All should be billions. BUT, this was apparently written with the old idea that billions was misunderstood by a UK audience, so they were are commaed, not decimaled! I think they should all be changed to decimal. Forget the commas. The UK now understands billions the way everyone else does. (Don't know about commas though)!. Student7 (talk) 18:36, 23 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Economy of Quebec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:59, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Economy of Quebec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:26, 19 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Economy of Quebec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:39, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:57, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply