Talk:Drinking water quality in the United States

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2019 and 8 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ThomasDunker.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:50, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

No mention of pesticides?

I'm currently searching various articles to answer a personal question: what are the risks of groundwater contamination from (commercially synthetic) pesticides, specifically in our drinking water from a backyard well? I was surprised to see no mention of pesticide in this article. -PrBeacon (talk) 19:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Drinking water quality in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080404074256/http://ap.google.com:80/article/ALeqM5hGsoyElv4ZL879LW6z2aZS0Pix7AD8VA14500 to http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hGsoyElv4ZL879LW6z2aZS0Pix7AD8VA14500

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Some Proposed Changes

Hello, I am employed by Boston University's Fineman & Pappas Law Libraries. After reviewing this Wikipedia page, I believe that information from one of our faculty's scholarship might provide a valuable addition to this page. I would appreciate it if this requested edit could be reviewed.

Add to second paragraph: "Most of the public water systems that are out of compliance are small systems in rural areas and small towns." This is because most water supply systems are outdated and at risk of failing.' For example, 21 million people were at risk of drinking contaminated water that did not meet water quality standards in 2015, alone, as 9% of water systems were reported as having water quality violations. Cf2022 (talk) 18:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Cf2022

@EMsmile, you might want to look at this one, too. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Added the reference, not the phrase, which doesn’t fit the lead. The reference by itself fits the existing paragraph. Ferkijel (talk) 22:00, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

References

Wiki Education assignment: ENVS 135

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 January 2022 and 12 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Elinf5 (article contribs).

Djbaker22 (talk) 05:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)==Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis== This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 March 2022 and 30 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Djbaker22 (article contribs).

The article appears to be neutral. The claims or frames do not seemed to be heavily biased towards a particular position. There is room for expansion for section about Disinfectants; which could easily be expanded through more research on the matter. The information appears to be up to date, even discussing some changes to drinking water quality in the year 2021. Djbaker22 (talk) 05:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

nice map here of contaminant in us water per state

https://www.nrdc.org/resources/lead-pipes-are-widespread-and-used-every-state 91.154.169.156 (talk) 05:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Thoughts on Article

This seemed to be a neutral approach to informing the public about the drinking quality in the US. I appreciated the detail in which the author went into in regards to the specific substances being regulated by Federal standards. I think a deeper dive into the private water systems would be helpful as these are the systems that cause the most issues for Americans. The references seemed concrete and most if not all of the information was cited correctly. Although there is somewhat recent information cited, I believe that a refresh of data from the past couple years would also add to the validity of the article. Overall, I found it interesting to read, and very easy to understand. - Miele17 Miele17 (talk) 03:41, 1 September 2023 (UTC)