Talk:Dover test

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 96.42.119.57 in topic What in the world?

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dover test. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

What in the world? edit

On December 21, 1989, during the invasion of Panama, President George Herbert Walker Bush prohibited media coverage of returning casualties, apparently angered by a split screen, showing him giving a news briefing on one half of the screen, and returning caskets on the other half.

Is this some kind of sneaky historical revisionism and whitewashing? Bush instituted the Dover Ban in 1991 due to the Gulf War. It appears that every article about a conservative or Republican is filled with false statements to misdirect the reader. This happens so much and in so many articles that I can’t believe it isn’t intentional. Viriditas (talk) 02:09, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

[citation needed] 96.42.119.57 (talk) 17:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply