Wikipedia

Talk:Dorsey & Whitney

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

"Amy Klobuchar not a well known politician"? I had to read that twice to get a grasp on it... Thanks for adding the reference, Reaverdrop. Even before she entered the Senate race she was a known quantity in the Minnesota political (and certainly legal) scene. -- Bobak 00:02, 19 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

The link says nothing of her importance or popularity, it simply says she is a candidate. I dont think she is well known enough to be in the article, nor do i think that political bias should be a premise to allow her in the article. Grasp as many times as you want, but compared to a Vice President and a supreme court justice, a minnesota attorney who may or may not win a senate should be excluded. If she win the 2006 election, then it might be warranted to include her. Anyways, thats my two cents and explaination for removing her.--Gephart 04:04, 19 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Have you listened to MPR? Do you read the Strib, Pi-Press or City Pages? She is mentioned in any discussion of who the Democratic candidate will be in the same terms Hillary Clinton is brought up whenever anyone talks about the Dem's presidential candidate (I would use a Republican example, but it's not as clear on their side at the moment other than incumbants). If she were the Republican candidate it would be just as relevant. Removing her is absurd, and I say that as someone who is active in the Twin Cities legal community and familiar with its politics. A major law firm in Minnesota should be allowed to list the people who are recognizable in Minnesota, not just to the rest of the country. Because you may not be familiar with those aspects of the region, that does not serve as an adequate basis for removal. Readded without hestition. -- Bobak 16:57, 19 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Ok, i am going to drop this issue, but let me say a few last remarks. She may be notable to the legal community, but she sure is not very notable outside that community nor the state of minnesota. She may be mentioned in public media, but that is because she is the state attorney, which means she is sometimes going to be involved in high profile cases (correct me if i am wrong, but thats how i see a state attorney). She has yet to win the democratic ticket or a seat on the senate. Take yourself out of the legal community, such as myself, and try to see how i am looking at the issue. I am trying to examine the larger picture here, without bias. Anyways, i may re-open this debate at a later time, perhaps if she fails to win the senate seat. Thats all for now.--Gephart 21:13, 19 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
I would like to clarify my comments and say that I believe you were acting without any intented bias and with good faith. I will be willing to also revisit and change my position if she does not win the seat, but, before I became a lawyer, I could tell you the prosecutor of Los Angele County when I lived there was Gil Garcetti. I dunno, maybe I just remember this stuff ;-) --Bobak 21:28, 19 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

James O'Hagan

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

How can you not mention James O'Hagan in this article? Stop the cover-up. 168.122.82.106 22:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Dorsey logo.gif

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

Image:Dorsey logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dorsey & Whitney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:45, 14 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dorsey & Whitney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dorsey & Whitney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:12, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Dorsey & Whitney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dorsey & Whitney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dorsey_%26_Whitney&oldid=1223782949"