Talk:Donkey Kong Country (series)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Czar in topic Merge to Donkey Kong

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Donkey Kong Country which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 02:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Donkey Kong Country (series)

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Donkey Kong Country (series)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "tanaberetroIGN":

  • From Donkey Kong Country Returns: Craig Harris (17 June 2010). "E3 2010: Kensuke Tanabe and the Metroid Palm Tree". IGN. IGN. Retrieved 18 June 2010.
  • From Retro Studios: Harris, Craig (17 June 2010). "E3 2010: Kensuke Tanabe and the Metroid Palm Tree". IGN.com. IGN Entertainment. Retrieved 18 June 2010.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 16:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Donkey Kong Country (series)

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Donkey Kong Country (series)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Amazon.com":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 22:47, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Donkey Kong Country (series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Merge to Donkey Kong

edit

This article is chock-full of original research. Truth is that I'm finding few sources that discuss DKC as a separate series... it looks like someone just split out out from Donkey Kong#Donkey Kong Country series without the sourcing to warrant it. It also led to a bunch of other conclusions, such as including the DKL games and DK64 as part of the "DKC" series when no sources affirm that. As of now, would be better to cover all of this within the context of the main series article, and only split out summary style when the sourcing warrants it. czar 19:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Czar: I'm in favor of this change. I think your evaluation of this article is correct. How would I handle starting the appropriate discussion? E to the Pi times i (talk | contribs) 19:37, 1 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
@E to the Pi times i, this is the first response in over a year, so I wouldn't consider this controversial. Merge any necessary material if you have time and then we'd just redirect. czar 20:26, 1 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Actually, I think I may put a hold on combining. It will be more efficient to combine things after I've finished working on the DKC trilogy articles, since I will have collected reliable sources into distilled information about each game. E to the Pi times i (talk | contribs) 21:20, 1 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Two people is no consensus to merge anything (especially over one year after proposing it with no response). This needs to opened up much further and a lot more discussion with more people before anything can be done without possible reconsideration or edit wars over the issue.217.43.203.61 (talk) 21:49, 1 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

The concern is notability. Czar said "I'm finding few sources that discuss DKC as a separate series..." and "[it] would be better to cover all of this within the context of the main series article, and only split out summary style when the sourcing warrants it." Wikipedia:Notability says If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. From my reading of czar's research and my personal research, the DKC series may not merit a separate article from the DK series because it's not covered significantly as an independent entity in reliable sources. If you have reliable sources which cover the DKC series as a separate entity, you are welcome to add them, but otherwise redirection may be this article's future. I am not opposed to having an AfD in the future.
No response for a year can be taken as a sign either that nobody cares or has good, reliable source supported arguments for keeping the article. I suspect the former. Regardless, I am not taking any action in the near future. E to the Pi times i (talk | contribs) 03:25, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reopening this conversation. Does anyone have any sources that indicate that DKC is treated as a separate and distinct series from DK? Apart from sharing the same titles and cast of characters, I don't see why this should be treated any differently than sequels within the main DK series. czar 22:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Czar: The official website for Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze refers to the game as "the latest installment in the Donkey Kong Country series." Additionally, executive producer of Donkey Kong Country Returns and Tropical Freeze, Kensuke Tanabe, has referred to it as a "series" in multiple interviews. Toadster101 (talk) 19:05, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
But do those mentions indicate that DKC is treated as a separate/distinct series from DK? We judge independent notability on whether a topic has significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. What sources show depth into the distinction of DKC or the distinction between DKC and DK in general? If not significant, would still make sense to cover summary style within the respective section of the parent DK series article. czar 10:37, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Donkey Kong Country (series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Donkey Kong 64's relation to the series

edit

From my understanding, Donkey Kong 64 is not part of the Donkey Kong Country series. I have made my argument for removing it from the page here. If you are planning to revert, please discuss before reverting. --E to the Pi times i (talk) 19:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

(Much later comment) the essay I originally linked to support this is my own original research. This issue is discussed more legitimately here. eπi (talk | contribs) 16:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)Reply