 | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
WP:COATRACK edit
@Bobeldridge:, can you explain why you believe that this is acceptable in the context of the issues discussed at the essay WP:COATRACK? VQuakr (talk) 03:17, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Advert edit
Was reading an article in the New York Times
It describes and links to emails from the South Carolina AG office obtained under FOIA.
As you can see, Brown lobbied the AG to file suit in the Supreme Court to overturn the 2020 election.
But to the “advert” topic, you can see that Brown links to this Wikipedia article in his email signature. And unsurprisingly the writing and sourcing here are low quality and promotional. 24.90.99.162 (talk) 00:42, 9 October 2021 (UTC)