Talk:Dom (mountain)

Switzerland High‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains: Alps High‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Alps task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Misrepresentation of the difficulty of 'normal route'. edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Over the last month or so, a number of IP edits have for some reason attempted to suggest that the 'normal route' on the Dom is a difficult undertaking. Whilst for anyone who has actually been on this route, it is certainly a long ascent or descent, there are numerous published guidebooks that clearly show this is just a F+/PD- route of some 6 hours up straightforward glaciated slopes from the Dom hut, of little to no technical mountaineering difficulty at all. It's not really very steep - just unbearably long. I have included quotes and citations to UK guidebooks which prove the lack of difficulty of this route, and which describe it as "something of a snow trudge". Yet for some reason these are being unjustifiably excised. I'm not sure what the motivation is for these repeated edits, but they are completely misrepresenting this wonderful mountain.

To keep them happy, I have now added a section on ascending the south ridge (Domgrat) which first requires an ascent of the Taschhorn and the Alphubel. Now that is a properly challenging undertaking!

Please use this talk page to discuss and justify any suggested changes to the description of the voie normale, before attempting further alterations in order that a proper consensus can be achieved. Nick Moyes (talk) 13:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic