Talk:Disputation of Barcelona

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Reference to English Translation edit

http://medspains.stanford.edu/demo/barcelona/disputation.html

Is not a verifiable source. It has no Stanford insignia, it does not represent the Hebrew text and it serves to confuse, users would be better off relying on the actual text... Dannyza1981 (talk) 23:20, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think the sentence "Relying upon the reserve his adversary would be forced to maintain through fear of wounding the feelings of the Christian dignitaries, ..." should have a source. If there is something written that explains a person's motivations or thoughts, this must be quoted. Otherwise, it is not an objective statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.203.22.88 (talk) 15:15, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Bias edit

This article is a bit biased in favour of Judaism. We see multiple arguments from Nahmanides (along with refutations) yet we only get a paraphrase of the Christian side of the debate. This article leans too heavily on Jewish sources, and could possibly do with some additional neutral sources. Solntsa90 (talk) 01:04, 16 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Disputation of Barcelona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:05, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply