Talk:Democratic Party of Emilia-Romagna
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Checco in topic This page is not encyclopedic
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 December 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This page is not encyclopedic edit
This page is totally useless, a page for any regional section of a party is not permissible even in enwiki. If there is a real reason to maintain this page, please expose it, otherwise I will propose the deletion --Maremmano (talk) 22:29, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- The article deals with a leading regional section of the PD. This article is neither essential nor useless. I would keep it per consistency with similar articles: CDU Baden-Württemberg, SPD North Rhine-Westphalia, Scottish Labour Party, Scottish Conservative Party, Scottish Liberal Democrats, Scottish Labour, Scottish Conservative Party, Scottish Liberal Democrats, etc., not to mention the state/provincial sections of American/Canadian parties. --Checco (talk) 08:04, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- Most of your examples can be acceptable, the scottish parties are national parties, in USA the two major parties change characteristics and ideologies in each state, instead there are no apparent reasons regarding the examples of German parties, and above all there is no valid reason to maintain this page. Soon I'll ask the deletion of this page --Maremmano (talk) 22:24, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
- I disagree for the reasons cited above. I will thus remove the "proposed deletion" tag you recently added to the page (please note that the tag reads: "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason"; I object it). --Checco (talk) 09:48, 1 December 2014 (UTC)