Talk:Deal of the Century
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move 22 July 2018 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 20:33, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Deal of the Century → Deal of the Century (film) – There is a wrong ambiguity in using the article's title. Recently a new plan has been set by United stated to solve the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, it was called deal of the century same as the title of the movie. on other hands, based on WP:GNUM One of the biggest fallacies in determining the notability of a subject is the view that the results of a Google search can be used to assess notability. Ether Deal of the Century or "Deal of the Century " is checked through Search engines like Google, most of the result belongs to the united stated plan, not this movie. So according to the WP:NOTFILM, this title is not notable for the article of the movie. In conclusion, I suggest that for the article the current name move to Deal of the Century (film) Saff V. (talk) 06:12, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support the film is not that well known and the phrase is highly generic. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:44, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:TWODABS. There is already a hatnote on the film article's page directing wayward readers to the Deal of the Century "draft peace plan" (which is little more than a catchphrase now). Moving this page would simply inconvenience more readers without adding any benefit. If something comes of the peace plan, the issue can be reconsidered then. — AjaxSmack 03:23, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - Obscure and poorly received the film may have been, I think making the film less of a primary topic is too soon at the moment. Isn't the draft proposal an example of recentism? Also, the proposal hasn't yet passed. BTW, I somewhat confused it with Sale of the Century. --George Ho (talk) 15:48, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - Even given the extreme sloppiness of the Trump administration, I find it very hard to believe that the Deal of the Century (draft plan) won't at some point be given a proper, at least half-way sensible, official name. At that point the other article can be renamed accordingly and the issue becomes moot. Of course, if it doesn't, then we can revisit this later. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:30, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.