Talk:Day of Six Billion

Merge Adnan Nevic

This individual's only claim to notability is being the child named as number 6 billion by the UN. By WP:NOTABILTY, this is not sufficient to warrant an individual BLP page, and thus it should be merged with this page. Fences and windows (talk) 17:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

I agree. This article should be merged Niel.Bowerman (talk) 11:56, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Agreed - doesn't warrant it's own page at all PatrickAnimi (talk) 13:43, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

• Oppose - the subject is likely to have been covered by multiple sources, and is therefore notable for enough for inclusion.--Joshua Issac (talk) 19:25, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Notability

This article is just speculation. It has no factual basis whatsoever. Unless proper references can be given, it is not worthy of an entry at all. ColneyBoy (talk) 15:13, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

It does have some factual basis, in that the UN actually designated him the 6 billionth. It's almost certainly not true, but the fact that it still was designated did happen, so should be included. However, I agree that it doesn't need it's own article. PatrickAnimi (talk) 13:43, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

So tagged. Discussion? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 13:34, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Categorizing

See WP:RCAT: "Redirects whose target title is incompatible with the category" and " Subtopic categorization". This is not an alternative name of the artuicle. This is a different subject, and needs its own categories. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:11, 3 October 2015 (UTC)