Talk:David Ossman
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the David Ossman article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editEr... oops. I meant Dick Ossman when I wrote that comment at PC World. Sorry to David Ossman. - Ta bu shi da yu 07:24, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps you meant the David Letterman favorite Dick Assman? Whatever it was, if it wasn't David Ossman, that should be clarified in the article, if it needs to be there at all. Richard K. Carson 04:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Is two years long enough to wait? I've pulled this from the article. Preserved for posterity below, in the event it's ever clarified who the quintessential quantum unit of fame is...
- In the Feb 21, 2006 "Feedback" column of PC Magazine, Chris Sherlock (a Wikipedia administrator) wrote:
Although Wikipedia has many oddball articles (for instance, we have one on Exploding whales) not everything can be included. We routinely delete articles about people who are deemed to be non-notable (admittedly, this is a fairly low standard - we have an article on David Ossman...)
- This leads to the following definition:
- One Ossman: the smallest unit of fame that will get you into Wikipedia.
- --NapoliRoma (talk) 01:31, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
"Filmography"
edit...is pretty obviously a direct cut 'n' paste from IMDB. I formatted it a bit, but am wondering if the proper action is to remove it entirely... --NapoliRoma (talk) 01:48, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on David Ossman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070219014308/http://www.doctechnical.com/fst/mfp/img/ossman1.jpg to http://www.doctechnical.com/fst/mfp/img/ossman1.jpg
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC)