Good sources for incorporation edit

Happened across an 8,000 word expose on Dobrik in Rolling Stone, published June 23, 2021. Looks like it has a lot of good info that could benefit this article.

Looks like there are another few articles from highly reputable sources that should definitely be incorporated...

And it looks like there's one more source that's used just once in the article to support a narrow fact, and could be used to reliably fold in additional information about Dobrik: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrinkydinks (talkcontribs)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 October 2022 edit

From “is a Slovakian Internet personality.” to “is a Slovak Internet personality.”

(See Slovak Republic) ZhekyllIs (talk) 10:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  DoneSirdog (talk) 01:16, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

I removed references of his death edit

I removed references of his death from his article. If there is proof that he died, then revert my changes. So far, I haven't seen anything about that. To the person who did that, maybe next time WAIT before you claim somebody's dead...it's very over-the-top. JosephMarigold (talk) 06:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:24, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply