Das Dritte Reich was created or significantly enhanced by WikiProject Reference Desk Article Collaboration, a project to leverage research efforts on the Reference Desks into a more lasting contribution to the encyclopedia. If you would like to help, please consider joining us. See original question.Reference Desk Article CollaborationWikipedia:WikiProject Reference Desk Article CollaborationTemplate:WikiProject Reference Desk Article CollaborationReference Desk Article Collaboration articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Much off this is an analysis/book report type text, which would be fine for the reference desk but when inserted into an article needs to have its conclusions sourced and tone cleaned up. Sentences like "The temptation is to see this difficult little book as an advocate for what was to come; but this gap between the ideal vision and the historical truth is virtually unbridgeable." are simply inappropriate for a reference article. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 17:17, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Although she is enormously appreciated on Reference Desk, Clio the Muse is new to mainspace. If you wished to hurt a newbie or to drive away a potentially valuable contributor from article space, you probably succeeded. If you did not, I question your judgment in handling the delicate issue. --Ghirla-трёп- 21:41, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps I am ignorant and Night Gry has done something else, but do you really consider adding the Essay tag to be so destructive to Clio's psyche?Yeago 03:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Every edit page has a warning on it: "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it." I don't see anything hurtful about marking an instance of inappropriate writing style. It's fine in a forum with space for the author's personal opinions, but in mainspace we need to defer to sources. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 16:47, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
