Talk:Danny Sillada
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 August 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Notability edit
The artist, according to the present version of the article [1], has been the subject of a student newspaper article and a University research paper. In itself, this does not constitute notability. Things that would help include: evidence of significant press coverage, major prizes or awards, work held in significant collections.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 12:39, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
ON SILLADA edit
I’m a UP Diliman graduate and I’ve been following Sillada’s art, writings and performances since my college days. I’m just wondering, is the “tag” for deletion of his bio in Wikipedia fair by a 17-year old freshman Tirao (JL)?
The link to Asian Journal in the article shows that Sillada recently exhibited in Philippine Center in Manhattan, New York, with his music and poetry, which was attend by Ambassador Hilario Davide and other notable guests. Other link to Sillada’s page shows the photo of Sillada, during his exhibit in Philippine Center, with one of the richest and most powerful women in New York, Loida Nicolas-Lewis.
Sillada is a multitalented artist from Mindanao, a rare Filipino talent; making the Filipinos proud of his achievements and artistic endeavors. This brief article about him in Wikipedia is just a minute glimpse of who he is. ~~Therese G.~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.3.25.125 (talk) 10:56, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with this notion, Filipinos must promote identity. But remember that Wikipedia is not a repository website where everybody can give what they want--the article itself must gain notability, especially biographies like this one. According to WP:Artist, he must least developed new concept in the field where he excelled, in this case, he is a surrealist painter and he doesn't developed that idea. Yes, he have "Menstrual Period in Political History", supposed to be an important media in history especially during Hello Garci scandal, but what about other painters that did the same and has the same ideas with him? The inline citations rarely distinguish him, or at least, the links never mentioned him, I do not know why this happened. Most links came from Multiply or privately-owned blog sites. According to this rule, it is unwise to use blogs as external links or as citation. To paraphrase, blogs are solely interpretation of the concern and are subjected to bias; i.e., I can say on my blog that "Sillada is the greatest born Filipino painter, greater than Amorsolo and others". That is extreme bias, especially that majority of blogs (esp. Multiply) tend to give opinions rather than the truth. To continue, it was also said that the artist's work(s) must "...(a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention,..." In this case, the "Menstrual Period" was the only mentioned work that gained critical analysis: and it was referenced to a website where it is very very difficult to confirm whether it was really said on that site. Furthermore, the article fails WP:MUSICBIO.--JL 09 q?c 12:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
NME edit
[2] Not sure if this is editorially uploaded or user uploaded to the NME site. Ty 02:54, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Danny Sillada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090925083904/http://www.illustrado.net/ to http://www.illustrado.net/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607211918/http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/204768/william-yu-and-his-art-divine-worship to http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/204768/william-yu-and-his-art-divine-worship
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080129141515/http://www.spraci.net/news/articles/3721.html to http://www.spraci.net/news/articles/3721.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071201072233/http://dcsillada.multiply.com/ to http://dcsillada.multiply.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:30, 4 September 2017 (UTC)