| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
due process edit
We should refer to some of her works on Technological Due Process. Jim.henderson (talk) 15:46, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Request to Add MacArthur Fellow edit
 | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello, I would like to propose the following be added to law professor Danielle Citron's article at the end of the first paragraph under Biography: Citron was awarded a 2019 MacArthur Fellowship for her work in cyber harrassment.[1]
JRobble (talk) 14:37, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Danielle Citron: Legal Scholar, Class of 2019". MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved 25 September 2019.
Reply 25-SEP-2019 edit
Edit request implemented
- The requested claim was added.
Additional changes made:
- Claims which were unreferenced were omitted.
- Her house intelligence committee testimony was given a
{{when}}template. - Instances where the subject was referred to as "Professsor Citron" were removed per MOS:CREDENTIAL
- Accolades which did not demonstrate having their own Wikipedia article were omitted per WP:NPOV.[a][b]
Regards, Spintendo 03:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Notes
- ^ By their very nature, awards can be subjective — in that they represent a very specific point of view — the point of view of the individual or organization which determines who wins the award and why. To counter this, a good practice is to limit the listing of awards to only those which are independently notable in Wikipedia. This is not due to WP:N (which is not a content requirement), but rather, to ensure WP:NPOV. The adding of several points of view to an article in the form of awards mentioned may skew the article's balance.[1] Thus, my own practice is to limit the listing of awards to only those which are independently notable in Wikipedia.
- ^ By this same logic, the awarding of the MacArthur Fellowship (which has its own Wikipedia page) was approved and added to the article.
References
- ^ "WP:BALANCE". Wikipedia. 20 July 2019.
...articles should not give minority views or aspects as much of or as detailed a description as more widely held views or widely supported aspects.
Credit scoring edit
What about her work with Frank Pasquale, The Scored Society?
What on earth edit
What on earth is going on here? So many violations on this article starting with WP:NOTDIR and WP:PROMO. Good lord. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 10:23, 2 July 2022 (UTC)