Talk:Murder of Daniel Wretström

Lack proofs and references

A warning banner should be displayed on this page to warn that it lacks references and is highly disputed. A whole section exists without a single reference. All statements that lacks such should be removed.

Bias

This article is a prime example of what the founder of Wikipeda states regarding the downfall of Wikipeda as becoming less reliable, a political platform for left-wing extremism who support patriarchal violence against women and pro-Islamism. Despite thousands of similar cases every year, there is no mention about this phenomena, how common and widespread this sort of racist-driven atrocities against native Swedes and native Swedish females in particular really is, which has become a major problem. In scientific papers to conceal cause and effect and such relevant facts make such paper biased and of poor value. The absence of civil courage in Sweden to intervene, which has facilitated those who abuse Swedish women, has to be pointed out. This very article is yet another low mark of low factual value as its purpose is to justify hate, racist-driven rape and violence against venerable females of certain ethnicity and murder of those who object and interview. It dehumanizes and discredits the victim by adding irrelevant highly negative attribute. It is heavily biased in favor of the culprit and what he represents. It should be reviewed by moderators. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.67.95.197 (talk) 10:11, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Criticism

It's what ? An article from an encyclopedia or from "the Sun" ?

Lies (sexual assault ?!), lack of facts (racist agression ; The victim was coiled blows, then cut the throat of whereas it still lived), errors on the judgments (manslaughter WITHOUT the will to kill, man !), lack of the fact in sweden, this judgment => no more than one real year in jail, link with the prim minister declarations (that one can summarize of "kill all the racists"), link with the fact that the parades in his memory are regularly attacked by "antiracists"... who claim that they act thus "to defend the right of all to circulate". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.170.80.12 (talk • contribs)

Was he racist or not?

Awhile ago, someone changed "racist skinhead" to just "skinhead," with an edit note saying "He wasnt racist nor he was a nazi, he was just a skinhead." If he was really a non-racist skinhead, why did his friends and family allow others to portray him as a martyr for the white nationalist cause? Why wouldn't they have tried to use the event to warn about the dangers or racial conflict? Did they speak out to the media, explaining that he would not have agreed with the neo-Nazis politicizing his death? Why would (according to the article) Combat 18 call him "a modern Horst Wessel" if he wasn't killed for his political beliefs? Spylab 18:29, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

if he is to be called racist on such grounds, anyone may be called racist. The word racist is an expression of biased feelings against individuals who are disliked, not on accuracy or science.

To be fair Horst Wessel wasn't very politically active either. // Liftarn

According to at least one English reference (and probably a bunch of Swedish sources), Daniel Wretström played drums in the white power band Vit Legion. Therefore, it is clear that he wasn't "just a skinhead." I adjusted the article to reflect that fact. Spylab 02:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

BLP

He was convicted of manslaughter. Entire article needs refs. 01:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Since others were convicted also, not reasonable to include him alone, sentence removed, refs inserted.DGG 02:06, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Daniel Wretström. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100815023413/http://www.sakerhetspolisen.se/english/english/countersubversion/politicalextremism/thewhitepowerscene.4.7671d7bb110e3dcb1fd800018826.html to http://www.sakerhetspolisen.se/english/english/countersubversion/politicalextremism/thewhitepowerscene.4.7671d7bb110e3dcb1fd800018826.html
• Added archive https://archive.is/20120709062622/http://antisemitism.tau.ac.il/asw2002-3/sweden.htm to http://antisemitism.tau.ac.il/asw2002-3/sweden.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:12, 18 September 2017 (UTC)