Talk:Daniel Coburn

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

  • There is a lot of information here that was POV or unverified. This article needs major cleanup. I corrected basic errors, but had to erase a lot of information because it was POV. Also, this article does not conform to WP:BIO standards. -- Metromoxie 16:57, 15 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
  • Anything notable is covered at Ilario Pantano. Could we move some of the content pertaining to the trial there and delete the rest? Looks like it needs AfD.
    • I think it wouldn't be unreasonable to just redirect this page to Ilario Pantano.

Thanks  :) Dlohcierekim 00:52, 18 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Explanation for article cull edit

I reduced the article to a couple sentences due to it being source-free. From WP:CITE:

Any material that is challenged and for which no source is provided may be removed by any editor.

In the case of this article, deleting unsourced content (as opposed to merely using {{fact}} tags) is especially critical due to WP:BLP:

Editors should remove any controversial material about living persons that is either unsourced, relies upon sources that do not meet standards specified in Wikipedia:Reliable sources, or is a conjectural interpretation of a source.

Finally, a quote from our fearless leader:

"I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons." - Jimbo Wales

I am not disputing the truth of the sentences I removed. However, the need for citations--especially for negative statements--trumps all other considerations on BLPs. I hope this clears up any confusion concerning my actions. Simões (talk/contribs) 19:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Okay.
References provided.
Cheers! -- Geo Swan 22:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Daniel Coburn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply