Talk:Dan Rosenfield
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Does this page still qualify as a stub?
editWikipedia’s description of a stub article is quite ambiguous, defining one as “lacking the breadth of coverage expected from an encyclopedia”. I feel as if this article now has adequate information, however I thought that it would be best to develop a consensus before I removed the stub tag. DanJWilde (talk) 08:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Edits on 30 January 2022 by myself and 213.205.198.156
editI've added to the talk page in an effort to avoid edit warring. I do not believe the article as written by 213.205.198.156 was in line with Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons and Wikipedia:Good articles due to frankly trivial information being included as well as the page failing to strike a balance and failing to present negative articles conservatively as stipulated by Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons.
I would additionally remind 213.205.198.156 that Wikipedia's guidelines advise editors to assume good faith; I do not appreciate being accused of attempting to whitewash the page, especially not with personal interest. If it happens again I will seek guidance from Wikipedia's more senior editors as to what steps I can/should take to prevent it. Asrieltheoracle (talk) 09:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Photograph
editIs there a more recent photo of him? The current one looks very out of date. 92.40.179.234 (talk) 13:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Searching 'Dan Rosenfield' on Wikimedia Commons doesn't herald any more results, unless you can figure anything else to search which may give one. Asrieltheoracle (talk) 13:12, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Link clarity
editThe article linked to should correspond as closely as possible to the term showing as the link, given the context. The reason for this is so that people understand what (or who) the link is pointing to. Everyone knows this person by the name under which they became nationally and internationally prominent in the period after 2003. See the discussions here and here. Cambial — foliar❧ 01:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Please stop talking nonsense. We have very clear rules.HulkNorris (talk) 06:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
- Your comment is unintelligible. Cambial — foliar❧ 12:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)