Talk:Cyclosportive

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 213.149.51.159 in topic Haute Route

Untitled edit

They are races. Anyone who thinks they aren't should ride in the top ten in one of these events. Participants have motor support and ride it like a race, they are awarded prizes, people's finishing position and time is logged and there are podium presentations at the end. Winning a race like the Ardechoise or Marmotte is something of considerable prestige for french amateur riders. Just because many participants don't treat it as a race (like the London Marathon) it doesn't mean it isn't a race. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.227.33.188 (talk) 21:06, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

There is a (not entirely serious) school of thought which maintains that the difference between an Audax ride and a cyclosportive is that the riders in the former pretend they're not racing, while the participants in the latter pretend they are... Mr Larrington (talk) 13:57, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Suitable bikes for the sportive edit

This section sounds biased to me and I propose removing it. I don't doubt that racing bikes are used by the majority of riders, but I bet you will also find some mountain bikes. I don't think that everyone considers "in equal proportions" comfort and speed. Finally, the paragraph on carbon bikes is POV - non-carbon bikes are perfectly suitable for cyclosportives too. RosinDebow (talk) 03:34, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

There were no objections, so I went ahead and removed the section. RosinDebow (talk) 12:37, 5 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Timing Standards edit

If anyone knows the formula for timing standards I think that would add useful information. For instance it is often stated that Gold/Silver/Bronze standards are based on Age, Sex, distance, and vertical distance but it would be nice to know how much each attribute contributes to the calculation.

Thanks Chris 14 September 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cpd1010 (talkcontribs) 17:54, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Gran Fondo edit

Please consider incorporating material from Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gran Fondo into this article before said page is deleted. ~KvnG 22:14, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wouldn't that material be more appropriately incorporated at Gran Fondo Qwfp (talk) 07:49, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Cyclosportive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:00, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Haute Route edit

7 days of back to back mountain stages. 213.149.51.159 (talk) 17:24, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply