Open main menu

Contents

External links modifiedEdit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Culture of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:53, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Inappropriate wordingEdit

"A strand of what may be described as American culture started its formation over 10,000 years ago with the migration of Paleo-Indians from Asia, Oceania, and Europe, into the region that is today the continental United States." Yeah, I guess semantically you could also call this "American culture". But not only do we have no idea what this supposed culture from over 10,000 years ago would have been like, it also has absolutely nothing to do with the subject. I have no idea what it's doing there. Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde) (talk) 21:59, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modifiedEdit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Culture of the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:48, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

a history of the united statesEdit

president vice president and secrectaires --2605:6000:ECA1:8800:BD94:F869:5FA0:AD9B (talk) 23:52, 11 January 2018 (UTC) supermeme court and federal courts congress: sentate and house of presentatives

South Louisiana French Heritage and CultureEdit

I am not sufficiently expert to add this, but it seems that the unique culture of South Louisiana should be included under Regional Variations, and the use (Acadian) French under Language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.47.34.77 (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposing a mergerEdit

Reason: lack of responses
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

I propose to merge Sexuality in the United States into Culture of the United States. I think that the content of Sexuality in the United States can easily be explained in the context of the Culture of the United States, and the Culture of the United States article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Sexuality in the United States will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Plus, it makes sense to include it with the other elements of culture (such as marriage).ElectroChip123 (talk) 03:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Sexuality in the United StatesEdit

Discussion Complete, Result: Don't merge
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

I propose to merge Sexuality in the United States into Culture of the United States. I think that the content of Sexuality in the United States can easily be explained in the context of the Culture of the United States, and the Culture of the United States article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Sexuality in the United States will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Plus, it makes sense to include it with the other elements of culture (such as marriage). All of the content in the "sexuality in the united states" can be fit into it's culture, religion, and marriage pages. That said, like culture, religion and marriage have an effect on it, and as such, it is more related to our culture. Hence, I am proposing to merge it into "Culture of the United States" over the other two options. ElectroChip123 (talk) 15:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Not a bad idea in principle, but I think merging it into Culture of the United States at this time, while it's marked as having multiple issues (including that it may be confusing or unclear to readers) and probably bites more than it can chew will most likely make it worse. It will make the Culture of the United States article even more convoluted and make the decent Sexuality in the United States become just another section in an article full of problems.
Again, this would probably not be a problem if the Culture of the United States was up to standards, but at this time it's really not and I really can't see the proposed merger helping with this. PraiseVivec (talk) 17:21, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
  • What occurs to me is that by the time the "culture" article reaches its full potential this will be a distraction that is better handled in a separate and rather extensive article. Jzsj (talk) 12:27, 28 March 2019 (UTC)


  • I recently went to the Culture of the United States because I wanted information on Sexuality in the United States. I was surprised to see it was not included. While merging may not be the best option, it is important to be aware that other readers may go to this page searching for this information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1004:B03A:FC43:9098:49D4:3796:684 (talk) 17:38, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Support I could certainly this this continuing to expand as a {main} subarticle, but I definitely see a place for this in the culture article. Reywas92Talk 19:03, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Return to "Culture of the United States" page.