Talk:Cueva Pintada (California)

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 12 September 2024 by reviewer OhHaiMark (talk · contribs).

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sourcing errors

Latest comment: 8 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

@Netherzone: The source: for La Cueva Pintada article is coming from the California State Military Museum and their URL www.militarymuseum.org is listed on the Wikipedia article. There email address is history@cmd.ca.gov. Is this one not reliable website and source? Greg Henderson (talk) 18:14, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good to know. I'm sure you will be able to find a solid source for The Salinan Native American tribe lived along the Salinas River, encompassing present-day Monterey County and San Luis Obispo counties. that was removed along with one of the low quality sources, maybe in an anthropological book or journal article. It was an interesting aspect of the article. Netherzone (talk) 20:16, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

WP:GEOFEAT applies to heritage-listed buildings

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The issue about Notablity was covered in this deletion nomination discussion for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/27–29 Fountain Alley. The discussion says: WP:GEOFEAT, which says Artificial geographical features that are officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level and for which verifiable information beyond simple statistics is available, are presumed to be notable. Being on the NRHP, this passes WP:GEOFEAT. Greg Henderson (talk) 17:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reply to article comments

Latest comment: 3 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Reply - I have created a Draft:Cueva Pintada (disambiguation) page to handle this. Once this page has been reviewed and accepted it can be used in conjuntion to the Cueva Pintada (disambiguation) information for the article. Greg Henderson (talk 10:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reply #2 - Please see WP:GEOFEAT, "Artificial geographical features that are officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level and for which verifiable information beyond simple statistics is available, are presumed to be notable." Greg Henderson (talk 17:39 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Presumed doesn't mean guaranteed; all article subjects must be shown to meet WP:GNG at a bare minimum. Left guide (talk) 00:50, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Comment: - Corrected close paraphrasing from these sources. In addition, Copyvio Detector vilolation is unlikely at 16%. Greg Henderson (talk) 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Greg Henderson (talk) 15:00, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic