Talk:Crawford's Plantation House

United States: South Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

I've added back the content of this article. A few things.

First, plain, historical facts are not subject to copyright. After all, there are only so many ways to say, "George Washington was the first president of the United States." Copyright exists to protect unique expressions, not the underlying information. So, when a source is just collecting objective facts, copyright protection is at its lowest.

Second, the material here was authored by the South Carolina Department of Archives and History, and its writings are not protected by copyright since the South Carolina Freedom of Information Act authorizes wholesale copying of public records (and the Dept. of Archives' summary is one) unless some special restraint applies (and none does here). See S.C. Code Ann. sec. 30-4-30 (2007).

Third, and most importantly, generally, Wikipedia editors shouldn't cut cut out 95% of an article without first discussing the matter on the Talk page. At least give a guy a chance to fix something or discuss the matter before erasing something. I'm glad to go back and play with the language. As noted, there are only so many ways to say that a house as gable ends, but I'm glad to cut and paste things to avoid literal transcription.

Add topic