Since the AfD discussion resulted in a keep, not a no consensus, that means that this article has been deemed sufficiently notable to have an article here. Unless I am misunderstanding something about AfD process...? Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 11:39, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
- I concur. I have removed the tag. MickMacNee (talk) 12:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
- Would someone mind explaining what is notable about the company? The article really doesn't make that clear at all. -- JediLofty UserTalk 12:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
- From WP:N: "[It] has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 14:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
- I disagree that because the article survived the AfD process that it cannot be tagged. Olana North (talk) 13:26, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
- It was brought to the community for discussion, and the discussion resulted in a keep—the article's subject is notable. If there is disagreement so soon after an AfD, it should be brought to WP:DRV, not slapped with a "notability" tag. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 14:22, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
