Talk:Commonwealth Avenue (Boston)

Design questions

This source seems to imply that Olmstead designed the Newton portion of Comm Ave in 1893. Another source implies that Olmstead commented on but did not design the Back Bay portion. It would be informative to figure out the whole story of Olmstead's involvement, and also nail down exactly when each segment of the road was designed and constructed and what the original design consisted of (e.g. whether or not it had integrated rail lines, trees, art, etc.). -- Beland 02:06, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Boston Marathon

Should there be a mention about this part of the route? Heartbreak Hill is on Comm Ave, right by Boston College... Just a thought. Paul^C/_T+ 02:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Commonwealth Avenue article

Hello Pzavon, small capitals are used to limit the disruption of text. Full capitals do not compliment lowercase and introduce great contrast. Small capitals limit the disruption of texture and reduce disruption of the reading process.

You reverted most of my edits on the text, most of it edited to sound more like spoken language, for wiki MoS, or, for better grammar and structure. The article was rife with bad grammatical structure and poorly organized. In future please try to include an edit summary explaining why your changes. Your first round of edits that reverted most of my edits had no edit summary. Thanks. CApitol3 (talk) 03:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

I disagree with your assessment that my edits were more like spoken language. They were intended to improve clarity, in part by minimizing unnecessaryly long words and phrases when shorter would do just as well. This is called "copy editing" and that is what I put in the edit summary. I see no value in trying to describe each such alteration specifically in an edit summary.

With regard to use of capitols, the use of capitols in acronyms for proper names is quite normal. I've never seen small sizing such as you did in that context. "MBTA" is the standard acronym for that organization and is properly tied to the next several words as a single phrase. Making the four letter smaller places undue visiual emphasis there. I will again remove your smaller HTML coding.

If the article is "rife with bad grammatical structure" change it. That's what I was doing with your edits. Pzavon (talk) 03:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi Pzavon, I want to suggest that you have misread some of my comments. Wikipeidia style is encylopedic and accessible, and should be written, where possible, in spoken style. A few subjects, maths and science might require language most of us don't grasp, but urban planning/street descriptions can be explained in a conversational style. That was my intent. I was not attempting to make it florid, complex, or inpenetratable. More, I was attempting to use a tone more like other wikipedia articles on the subject of architecture and urban planning. A basic premise of writing is to organize paragraphs around an idea. The text was quite disorganized, and organizing information is a part of editing. I was not suggesting that you had made your edits like spoken language. That would be something I would not undo. I was stating that I had made my edits to sound like spoken language. You misread that. Your first round of edits, where you effectively reverted close to 90 percent of my edits, had no edit summary. You state that you "see no value in trying to describe each such alteration specifically in an edit summary" wikipedia policy disagrees. And an edit where you alter substantially a previous edit calls for such. Thanks. CApitol3 (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

As to small capitals, not capitols, one is a lettering style the other a legislative building, wikipedia MOS is not to limit it to acronyms. CApitol3 (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

I do not understand your reference to the MOS policy not to limit it to acronyms. With specific regard to use of acronyms, see for example the usage throughout the Wikipedia for SEPTA, MARTA, and BART, the acronyms for the subways in Philadelphia, Atlanta, and San Francisco, respectively. All are always presented in normal sized characters. This is also the case with less closely related acronyms such as EPA, OSHA, FDA, DOT, and lots of other governmental alphabet soup. Pzavon (talk) 04:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Commonwealth Avenue (Boston). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311090440/http://www.nabbonline.com/commonwealth_mall.htm to http://www.nabbonline.com/commonwealth_mall.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060716171640/http://www.nabbonline.com/statues.htm to http://www.nabbonline.com/statues.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060716171640/http://www.nabbonline.com/statues.htm to http://www.nabbonline.com/statues.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070616172443/http://www.helloboston.com/Images/Panoramic/5302005Commonwealth_Ave_1903b.jpg to http://www.helloboston.com/Images/Panoramic/5302005Commonwealth_Ave_1903b.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:18, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Topical run-on

The 1st two paragraphs of section "Description" are fine. But then discussion slams into a blow-by-blow of all the subway stops. Then, without taking a breath, we're told about the unique neighborhood of Comm. Ave. in the vicinity of B.U. Sever these two topics into separate sections. Insert section heading "Subways [and buses?]", and "B.U. neighborhood". For that matter, you presently have only 1 sentence about the latter.

Mall

Searching on "Commonwealth Avenue Mall" redirects here. But treatment may want a bit of beefing-up. I mean, you are talking about one of the components of the Green Necklace here.

Desideratum no. 1: You tell us the distance from Kenmore Sq. to Packard's Corner but not the distance from the Public Garden to Kenmore Sq. But it's one of the top statistics in the Green Necklace. For all the parks in the Necklace we need to know their dimensions and acreage. Give us both, for the Mall.

Jimlue (talk) 02:48, 20 February 2020 (UTC)