Talk:Committees for the Defense of the Revolution

Latest comment: 4 months ago by 2600:1007:B02F:C5E7:C018:F560:B069:2242 in topic Citation 11

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): RobJim. Peer reviewers: RobJim.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Quote edit

Removed the quote, "Citizens must be careful of their actions and of what they say, as they are being constantly monitored." It adds nothing to the article that isn't expressed elsewhere. I also deleted the equally unnecessary content note that tries to discredit the speaker of the quote. Martiano 21:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Author cites terrorist anti-Castro organization. edit

The author cites information from an anti-Castro, terrorist organization known as the Cuban American National Foundation. This organization was responsible for the bombing of hotels in Havana in 1997. One former leader of the organization is Luis Posada Carriles, who was indicted for the 1976 bombing of a Cubana Airlines flight 455, killing all 73 passengers onboard. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ghostofgushall (talkcontribs) 02:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

Other countries edit

There should be a separate article on CDR in Burkina Faso. Also, I think the name has been use in some other countries as well. --Soman (talk) 07:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Only Criticism? edit

This article mostly focuses on the criticisms of the CDRs and has very little about the history or origins of them, let alone the argument of proponents of the organizations which see them as community organizations, not tools of repression.

Perhaps this is a NPOV issue? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KurtFF8 (talkcontribs) 13:24, 6 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

missing data; fake sense of "journalistic balance" a problem edit

Fantastic that the CDRs organize block parties, medical help and other fun stuff. But for at least some of these activities, non-participation is definitely not allowed, and if you do not participate, you can expect harrassment and even, in some cases, criminal penalties. So the "assistance" is not without some dangerous strings, on which you will not want to pull too hard. I don't see that there is really anything positive about these CDRs, at least in terms of human rights, thus, the attempt at "balance" in the presentation of their role would strike many readers as absurd and foolish, that is, it is fundamentally kowtowing to a dictatorial regime. It is as if Wikipedia, had it existed in 1936, had struggled to point out that the Nazi's Nuremberg laws were in fact doing a great job at allowing the Jews to have their own, special place within the Reich. The CDRs are equivalent to the government spying on its own citizens, and reducing the space of private life effectively to zero. The article should reflect that fact, rather than struggling to be "balanced." Theonemacduff (talk) 03:22, 13 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Committees for the Defense of the Revolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Additional Information edit

Hello everybody I added significant amounts of information to the page in the History, Functions and Activities sections. I look forward to your comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobJim (talkcontribs) 18:24, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Such nonsense should be deleted edit

Take a look at this sentence "Strong critics such as A. Rivera Caro, a journalist for El Nuevo Herald, trace Fidel Castro's CDR system's origin to the similarly named and directed "committees of territorial vigilance" established by Adolf Hitler in 1935." it should be deleted because of the following reasons: 1)That "journalist" works for a anti-Cuba newspaper accused of using government-paid journalists.(read their Wikipedia page "El Nuevo Herald")So it's not a reliable source. 2)The source is a YouTube video, which is not the best source to cite since it's a kind of self media. 3)Note that there was a "Worker's Party of Germany", does that mean every current Worker's Party can be "traced back" to that far-right ultranationalist party??? If no one opposes, then I'll delete that sentence. --A planetree leaf (talk) 11:05, 7 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Looks like no one opposed, so I removed that sentence. Feel free to revert the edit if you give a reason. --A planetree leaf (talk) 05:33, 16 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hand picked by Castro? edit

Under structure it says "Joining the committee is not selective; however, the top leadership of the organization is drawn from a select pool of loyalists at the discretion of Castro." which seems unlikely when Fidel (who it's probably reffering to as the source is from 1994) is dead. Is there any newer, more recent information about that that could replace this? KptStörtebeker (talk) 11:33, 7 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Citation 11 edit

This Citation (http://www.capitolhillcubans.com/2011/08/repressive-benefits-of-people-to-people.html) leads to a website that doesn't exist anymore 2600:1007:B02F:C5E7:C018:F560:B069:2242 (talk) 03:56, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply