Talk:Cochrane–Orcutt estimation

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Why only the Durbin Watson test ? edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

At the beginning of the Theory section, there is : "If it is found via the Durbin–Watson statistic", but other tests can detect serial correlation (such as Breusch–Godfrey). We should maybe : - precise that durbin watson is a solution but not the only one - delete the example, and just stay "If it is found that there is serial autocorrelation"

Any help / validation would be appreciated, this is my first contribution to Wikipedia ! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexiron (talk • contribs) 18:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic