Talk:Cloone

References

This is a wondrous article but it very urgently needs references. However I have provisionally upgraded it to a "C" in recognition of the effort and quality of the text. But please - refs. Sarah777 (talk) 11:57, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.aughavascloone.ie/cloone%20parish%20history.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 12:24, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

I did wonder whether the copying was the other way round, but this edit is decisive. -- John of Reading (talk) 12:24, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

References

It is important that information in the article can be cited back to original sources. Please concentrate on citing existing content rather than persistently trying to add unsourced information. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 18:22, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Coming from Cloone, I am the source, if you were from Cloone you would know that what I write is factual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.229.13 (talk) 19:45, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Unfortunately that is not sufficient. Please ask at the for example the WP:TEAHOUSE for more/independent advice. If you can find WP:V sources then all will be good; but if you aren't prepared to work that way then unfortuntely it will be necessary to remove things; and ultimately your edits will be seen as disruptive. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:00, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Thankyou for adding a source. I hope I (and others) will typically and generally lean to accepting pending changes with reasonable sourcing attempts with Pending changes.Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Possible pending changes to semi protection

In a nutshell if anon IPs persist in presenting the same unsourced (notably climate data at the moment) to pending changes that will simply result in the protection level of the page having to go up from Pending changes to Semi-Protection where anon IPs will find it much harder and painful to make contributions (not too difficult if you know what your doing and how to do it). Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC)