Talk:Clonmore, County Armagh

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

I'm thinking it would be best if we just had a picture of the clonmore team in the article rather than a picture of every player on the team. This is so the article won't get critized for having too many images on such a short article. The article is really meant to be about the town and of course the team are a big part of it but the article is becoming an article about the team not the town. So it would be best if there was just the team description, team picture and player list. But even the list of players is pushing it. And there is no point on creating an article for the team as the article creation critea is very high and it will just get deleted. AngelOfSadness talk 22:19, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi. This seems to be more about the team than the village. I'd ask you to leave the original "Clonmore" (Carlow) article where it is with the ref to this article on top of the page (usual procedure where there are only very few articles). Whatever way you did it the only way to find the Carlow article was through the Armagh one. Thanks (Sarah777 03:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC))Reply

I know that there is more about the team than the village right now. I was planning to add a whole load of info about the town during the coming weekend as I don't have much time during the week. Thanks for fixing the disam as I had a lot of trouble trying to fix it. AngelOfSadness talk 14:22, 26 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

No prob. Just a caution from my own experience; they don't like so-called "non-notable" individuals getting names and photos on Wiki. Maybe try and emphasise the team more - some editor (not me I assure you!) is likely to just zap the references and photos of individuals. Carefully positioned in a bigger article about the village and the team and with specific achievements of the selected players noted as their reason for selection and it should be OK; at the moment it is very vulnerable - though your "under construction" tag is a help. Best of luck! (Sarah777 19:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC))Reply

I see you removed nearly all the photos...maybe you should do separate articles for the village and the team? There is a format, templates etc for GAA teams; and a special box for towns and villages. (Sarah777 19:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC))Reply

I don't think there's a point on creating an article specifically on the team as it will only get deleted (probably because it's "not-notable" or something like that). Also other people keep adding POV's to the section on the team and I keep having to remove it all. I think just having the team description and team list is enough to get an idea about the team. Finding info about the village itself isn't easy as I was googling it for nearly an hour and found hardly anything. AngelOfSadness talk 19:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clonmore, County Armagh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120529233012/http://www.placenamesni.org/resultsdetail.phtml?entry=9848 to http://www.placenamesni.org/resultsdetail.phtml?entry=9848

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic