Talk:Clevis fastener

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 209.23.60.160 in topic Too many assumptions

Rename Article? edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Moved. Wizard191 (talk) 18:35, 21 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article is named after the pin used in a clevis fastener. So we have potentially clevis pin, clevis shackle, clevis hook, and clevis (by itself, which is the U shape piece of metal through which the pin goes). My suggestion is that we rename the article clevis, and include all of the related terms therein. That will make the article most substantial and complete. Any objections or suggestions? Nuujinn (talk) 13:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Based on what you just said a "clevis" is one part of the whole system, so I think renaming the article to clevis is much like what we have right now. How about we rename it to clevis fasteners, which can be all encompassing? Wizard191 (talk) 16:01, 20 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Sounds good to me. Nuujinn (talk) 17:12, 20 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Clevis and tang edit

These are unusual words, which is why I looked to Wikipedia to understand them in relation to the Challenger disaster. Clevis is here, but tang isn't (not this usage, anyway). So far as I can gather the tang is something that fits between the two prongs of the clevis, but I'm not confident enough to put this in. Will somebody expert put a mention of Tang into this article, and create a redirect from Tang itself? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.53.69.150 (talk) 14:47, 5 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've reworked the intro to include this. Let me know what you think. Wizard191 (talk) 16:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
I'm reliant on you for the explanation, so I can't really comment. But it certainly reads OK; thanks. Would you consider adding this use of the word "tang" to the disambiguation page for the word, and linking it to the present page? I can't do this, because I don't have an account. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.53.69.150 (talk) 16:41, 5 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Done. Wizard191 (talk) 17:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Great, thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.53.69.150 (talk) 01:23, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clevis fastener. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:47, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Too many assumptions edit

Clues: The words; tow, chain, and rope should be used in the lead paragraph or section? Cheers!
--2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:C16D:7F97:1C4C:6D39 (talk) 20:45, 18 July 2018 (UTC)Doug BashfordReply

Fu 2600:1017:B00E:C19A:A106:C1AD:E518:E498 (talk) 02:47, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
U think so fucktards 209.23.60.160 (talk) 05:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply