Talk:Cleveland Orchestra

Untitled

"Of the "Big Five" orchestras of America, it is considered to be the most European." I've never heard this before -- can you point to a source? I should have thought that the Boston Symphony or Philadelphia Orchestra would be more "European" than the Cleveland Orchestra. Grover cleveland 17:08, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

The most recent authoratitive cite for that is the Feb. 7th 2005 New Yorker. Unfortunately, it doesn't have its archives available for free, but here's a brief excerpt from The Seattle Times:

While writer Charles Michener stopped just short of declaring the Cleveland the best orchestra in the country, he called it "the only one with a collective identity" and "the most 'European' of the American orchestras, the only one that is distinctive and refined enough to stand alongside the two pre-eminent European ensembles: the Berlin Philharmonic and the Vienna Philharmonic." --Arcadian 17:26, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Discography

The official SonyBMG Masterworks discography link for this artist is as follows

• Discography at SonyBMG Masterworks

It (in most cases) contains a full listing of in-print CDs released on the SonyBMG labels within the US (for the moment), along with track listings and in some cases audio clips (which will become more robust in the new year). Ecommerce links are provided inobtrusively.

I have been informed that it creates a conflict of interest to post these links directly from my account, so please consider adding the page to the link section. Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Softlord (talk • contribs) 22:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC).

The problem is, The Cleveland Orchestra has recorded for many different labels. It was associated with Columbia (now Sony) from the Rodzinski to the Maazel eras. (Very little from Rodzinski's tenure has been issued on CD, but it should be, hint, hint.) The orchestra has also recorded for Telarc, DG, and other labels. To have a link to the Sony discography is not neutral. Be that as it may, I have created a page for the Cleveland Orchestra Discography and have linked it to this page.THD3 (talk) 17:37, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

quality

This article is really bad considering the importance of its subject. Anyone with the time and expertise to write something more complete? Markhh (talk) 22:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:HHSeverenceHall.jpg

The image Image:HHSeverenceHall.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

"Acclaim in the Press" section

I question the significance of this section. The wikipages of similar comparable orchestras do not have such sections, so why is it needed here? TheFinalSay (talk) 16:54, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. This sounds more like a press release than a serious NPOV article. A section disucssing the range of critical reactions to the orchestra would be okay, but a list of positive press blurbs seems frivolous. Markhh (talk) 17:10, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

I will remove this section. TheFinalSay (talk) 09:33, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Infobox?

The infobox for the orchestra is, in my view, just about completely useless. "Associated acts"? What on earth would they be for an orchestra? "Associated organizations," maybe. And are the only members of the orchestra those listed here? Of course not. That template was designed for pop performers; the consensus at the classical music project here in WP-land has been to remove these boxes. I will do so unless there is a huge outcry within the next day or two. --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 23:24, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cleveland Orchestra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060516205429/http://www.clevelandorchestra.com/html/PressRoom/pressreleases.asp?ID=100 to http://www.clevelandorchestra.com/html/PressRoom/pressreleases.asp?ID=100

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Severance music center

Severance Hall is now known as severance music center 65.189.202.143 (talk) 01:11, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Appearances

Nothing about them appearing on the Grand Funk Railroad song "Closer to Home"? I would think that would be worth mentioning for the sake of posterity. 71.168.150.196 (talk) 02:01, 7 May 2023 (UTC)