Talk:Citizens for a Sound Economy

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

Are these guys the ones who helped Nadar's campain hoping it would take away votes from the Democrats in the 2004 Presidential election?

Astro-turfing the Tea Party Movement edit

Does anyone have any info on whether or not CSE has astro-turfed the Tea Party Movement, as suggested in the documentary "(Astro) Turf Wars" by Taki Oldham? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.248.156.135 (talk) 17:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Could be true, but this would be considered a primary source. http://web.archive.org/web/20020821185019/http://www.cse.org/tea/about.php --Vidkun (talk) 18:45, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disputed citation edit

I added a dispute tag because the claim that CSE purchased the Tax Foundation in 1989 is inaccurate. The citation provided for this claim is not sufficient (it's an article from 1989 saying that this will happen in the future, but it does not claim that it did happen.) CSE provided financial support and shared office space with the Tax Foundation for a few years in the early 90s, but the two were always legally independent. Furthermore, there is no citation for the fact that the relationship lasted until 2004.Nkasprak (talk) 19:08, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Changed to {{disputed-inline}} — Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:52, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Nkasprak - do you have access to the 990's for the Tax Foundation (or CSE) from this time period? While I they can be acquired from the IRS, since you work at the Tax Foundation, I thought you'd have easier access. If they confirm the error, posting and citing them would forever resolve the issues with this article.--E8 (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Draffan Apex source edit

HughD, what is the basis for your position that this is a reliable source:

  • Draffan, George. The Elite Consensus. Apex. p. 66. ISBN 1-891843-14-1.

--Dr. Fleischman (talk) 05:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Can you link to an WP:RSN discussion on Apex? Thanks. Hugh (talk) 05:47, 5 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Do I need to? It's the burden of the editor seeking to include content to establish verifiability. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 06:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Never mind. There were two cited sources written by Draffan with very similar names, one published by a reputable publisher, the other published by a not-so-reputable publisher. I conflated the two. My apologies. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 06:08, 5 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Citizens for a Sound Economy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:48, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply