 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Citebase. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130706204510/http://iplus.ukoln.ac.uk/technology/citebase to http://iplus.ukoln.ac.uk/technology/citebase
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121029120924/http://www.citebase.org/ to http://www.citebase.org/
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130106053217/http://physnet.physik.uni-oldenburg.de/projects/SINN/sinn03/proceedings/brody.html to http://physnet.physik.uni-oldenburg.de/projects/SINN/sinn03/proceedings/brody.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:11, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Expert attention edit
An {{Expert-subject}} tag was dropped here in August 2014. The request was, "openness of software and data not indicated". There is no indication that the software was open. The data was openly available through the website through human and machine interfaces while it was running. According to a paper written by the creators, data came from, "the larger open access, OAI disciplinary archives - currently arXiv (http://arxiv.org/), CogPrints (http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/) and BioMed Central (http://www.biomedcentral.com/)." ~Kvng (talk) 18:31, 3 January 2023 (UTC)