Talk:Cicisbeo

Latest comment: 5 months ago by 78.150.243.134 in topic Pronounciation

Pronounciation edit

What a great word - but how is it pronounced? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.134.6.202 (talkcontribs) 13:32, 23 December 2005

See the article, there's now an IPA version of the word :-) Mstroeck 18:51, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
I'm pretty sure whoever wrote the pronunciation doesn't understand the IPA. I would correct it, but I'm not entirely certain of the vowels. embryomystic (talk) 08:20, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Seems to me that the pronunciation is similar to the English/Scots word 'Sissy', being a term for an effeminate male. Are the two connected?
('Titty' was always the UK pet name for 'sister' until this came to have prurient connotations and 'Sissy' took its place there for a short period among the middle classes.) 78.150.243.134 (talk) 01:32, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Cavalier Servente edit

Is this the same as a Cavalier Servente? - see Beppo - Cutler 18:25, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Now I see that it is [1] XXXVI-XXXVII - Cutler 18:30, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
Yes it is! Thank you for pointing it out, that was a regrettable ommission... Mstroeck 18:50, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Question - always single? edit

Fascinating article. The article states:

Customs of the time did not permit them to engage in relationships with any other women during their free time, making the arrangement rather demanding.

Does this includes wives, implying Cicisbeo were always (or mostly) single?-- Singkong2005 02:32, 31 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi Singkong. Thank you, I also think it's pretty interesting. Yes, Cicisbei were mostly single. In fact, many of them led a life of almost complete inactivity apart from the time they spent with their mistress. They often were younger sons of noble houses and by definition had no real place in society at that time. That's something want to make more clear in the article, I just have not gotten around to do it yet. Mstroeck 22:46, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I'm almost tempted to make a Wikipedia user box: "This user is available as a Cicisbeo... --Singkong2005 23:42, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
LOL. That would be excellent :-) Mstroeck 23:45, 2 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

minor comments edit

lovely article! concise and intriguing. just two minor comments:

  • the "J.G. Krünitz" external link cannot be accessed, or is it just my computer?
  • the section name "General" looks a bit odd to me... perhaps an article of this lovely length doesn't need division of sections at all (except the notes and bibliography).--K.C. Tang 07:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Hi! Thanks for your comments! The link works for me. There is a link on the page which says "direkt zum Artikel", which means "go directly to the article", and which you have to click. Unfortunately, the website does not seem to allow deep linking directly to articles... And you are of course right, the "General" heading was unnecessary, I removed it. --mstroeck 08:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Ah, I can access the link now! btw, would you also start the "petit-maître" article? I don't know what exactly a petit-maître means (a young man who dresses and behaves like a woman?), and why is he comparable to a cicisbeo (Was a petit-maître also employed as lovers by the noblewomen?). want to learn more. Cheers.--K.C. Tang 09:09, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
forgive my nitpicking, but i've got two more questions:
  • should the orthography be cicisbèo? and should the stress fall on the "e"?
  • could we have any source for the etymology? some sources say that the word derives from French chiche beau (it sounds rather unlikely to me), but in any case it seems that we cannot be quite sure of the etymology, so it may be good to have a source for that.--K.C. Tang 11:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply