Talk:Chiton

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Thylacine24 in topic Was this the correct use of italics

A note

edit

What about the article of early Greek clothing also called the Chiton? Thats what I'm trying to research.

That would be also known as a tunic 24.82.139.12 08:02, 11 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

I think when i read some articles about this, this article is confused and needs expert attention.--Filll 18:20, 18 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Chiton

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Chiton's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Jacobs2000":

  • From Mollusca: Jacobs, D. K.; Wray, C. G.; Wedeen, C. J.; Kostriken, R.; Desalle, R.; Staton, J. L.; Gates, R. D.; Lindberg, D. R. (2000). "Molluscan engrailed expression, serial organization, and shell evolution". Evolution & Development. 2 (6): 340–347. doi:10.1046/j.1525-142x.2000.00077.x. PMID 11256378.
  • From Mollusc shell: Jacobs David K. 2000. Molluscan engrailed expression, serial organization, and shell evolution. Evolution & Development 2: 340.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 13:01, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Chiton tuberculatus plates.jpg

edit
 

Is File:Chiton tuberculatus plates.jpg upside down? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • No. Head plates are at the top, tail plates at the bottom of the photo if that's what you're asking. --Tony Wills (talk)
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chiton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:56, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Was this the correct use of italics

edit

In this section, I found the following sentence:

They are also traditionally eaten in certain parts of the Philippines, where it is called kibet if raw and chiton if fried.

I removed the italics. Could anyone please tell me if this was the right decision?--Thylacine24 (talk) 15:03, 24 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Gumboots

edit

I don't think this edit is correct. This appears to be the name for only one species the Gumboot chiton. Invasive Spices (talk) 18 March 2022 (UTC)