Talk:Chaudhary Nisar Ali Khan

Biased article

I strongly feel that this article is strongly biased in favor of this subject and that it is not objective, it tends to (a) reflect too much broad credit to the subject for many things that he might or might not have achieved and (b) the negative and controversial sides of his career have not been mentioned , or properly touched upon to give a proper sense that this article is being written as per Wikipedia's given guidelines . In my opinion, it largely needs to be scrutinized by some objective/neutral editors , and extensively re-edited and re-written as per requisite standards. I do not have any personal differences with anyone and there is no need to be defensive , I am simply trying my very level best to express my opinion and request that the article may be scrutinized accordingly, Thank you. 39.54.50.130 (talk) 19:37, 9 July 2017 (UTC) Col (retd) Mumtaz Malik, Pakistan

Mumtaz Malik, I've written most of this bio and I don't see it a biased in favor of anyone. You need to point out the specific issues and where exactly the article gives unnecessary "broad credit to the subject" so that it can be fixed. Concerning negative and controversial sides of his career, don't you see the last para under political career is bit negative? but other than that I couldn't found any such information via reliable sources so I wonder if you can share few links here? But please keep in mind we generally avoid adding criticism and controversies or similar in BLP's because they are poor writing style and may compromise the article's neutral point of view of the subject. If it remains unclear what the NPOV violation is, the tag that you added may be removed. For you information, recently I was able to bring Ishaq Dar upto Good article status and it is as neutral as this bio is therefore I believe it is balanced, and most important well-sourced article via high-quality, independent, reliable secondary sources, which adhere to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Perhaps @Greenbörg: as an uninvolved editor can take a look at the page and give two cents? --Saqib (talk) 06:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Article is as neutral as it can be. Firstly, we don't add something which is unsourced so it should be sourced before adding. Secondly, I have read thoroughly and found nothing biased thing to either side. Greenbörg (talk) 08:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Chaudhry Nisar

@Saqib: @SheriffIsInTown: I think we should move this page to "Chaudhry Nisar" as per WP:COMMONNAME. Rarely any media refers to him as "Nisar Ali Khan" and as such it should be moved to Chaudhry Nisar. маsтегрнатаLк 18:57, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

I moved it to Chaudhary Nisar Ali Khan as that is what most sources address him by. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 19:35, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Nisar Ali Khan 1.jpeg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:23, 1 June 2023 (UTC)