Talk:Charles Gayle
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Charles Gayle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | An item related to this article has been nominated to appear on the Main Page in the "In the news" section. You can visit the nomination to take part in the discussion. Editors are encouraged to update the article with information obtained from reliable news sources to include recent events. Notice date: 8 September 2023. Please remove this template when the nomination process has concluded, replacing it with Template:ITN talk if appropriate. |
Untitled
edit"is considered a response to critics who charge that free jazz musicians cannot play bebop,"
The motherfucker was homeless for 20 years and has an album called "REPENT." I don't think he gives one loose fuck what any critic thinks.
Removal of interview link
editDoes the interview with Howard Mandel from the Wire have to be removed? It looks like the editor who removed it, MER-C, has accused the user who added the link, BartholomewBud of spamming by adding too many links to the Wire. And it looks like BartholomewBud has indeed added a lot of links to Wire interviews, maybe too many. Having said that, the Wire is pretty much the main magazine covering a lot of this music, so a certain degree of that is inevitable in a well-referenced article. In other words, I don't think it's a good idea to revert every single one of those edits. Could we split the difference, and keep at least some of those links? Goldenband (talk) 15:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Charles Gayle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080324231627/http://www.thewire.co.uk/articles/537/ to http://www.thewire.co.uk/articles/537
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:20, 3 August 2017 (UTC)