Talk:Charles Chusseau-Flaviens

comment

Not much is known about this important collection, nor its history. Please feel free to share any information you may have.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Apinrise (talk • contribs) 04:56, 12 June 2012‎

Original research

I have removed this:List of known photographer credits

1. Alexander de Bruxelles
2. Baucas (or Bancos)
3. Baute
4. Boissoimas & Eggler
5. Borringer
6. Brond
7. Bulla
8. Carl Sonne (images on wikimedia)
9. Centrale-Zurich
10. Ceylon
11. Ch. Chusseau
12. Chambou
13. ChenHot
14. Chusseau-Flaviens, Charles
15. Cousolas
16. deltahn
17. Dittrich (likely P. Dittrich)
18. Duschek (perhaps Franz Duschek)
19. Duwep
20. E.N.I.G. [?]
21. Elfelt (likely Peter Elfelt)
22. Eliner
23. Farnari
24. Flodin
25. Grapes Le Fairnres
26. Gunther
27. Guy de Coral
28. H.V. Perckhammer
29. Hise
30. J. Martin (also listed as Josiah Martin)
31. Jaeger of Stockholm
32. Larson (possibly A. Larson, photographer to Spanish king)
33. Laurberg
34. M. Jovanovitch
35. Ozyner
36. Peterson
37. Reissert & Fliege
38. Sebah & Joailler
39. Strazza
40. Van Leer
41. Voigt
42. Walden Fawcett (possibly the same photographer online at LOC)
43. Wilse (probably Noregian photographer Anders Beer Wilse)
44. Woltz
45. Zraginsky (or Braginsby)

This appears to be speculation or original research. Please use a proper reliable source to reference these names before re-adding. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 10:54, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

This is original research. Photographer names are derived from inscriptions on the photographic negatives. This research was carried out using the collection at George Eastman House. All of these inscribed negatives are available online through the link provided within this article's references section. Each name can be verified by checking against that source. When these names link to information about the photographer, this speculation is valid as these individuals were operating photographers at the time of the photo-syndicate's operation and would have been the only individuals to have had access to photograph Royalty.--Apinrise (talk) 03:40, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I thought it may be something like that -- that is why I removed it. Please read Wikipedia: NO Original Research. We cannot accept your own personal experience or research -- regardless that it is true. (Wikipedia policy requires Verifiability, not truth.) We can only accept information that is verifiable through independent published reliable sources. Now, it is permitted to use the actual photograph (or in this case, glass negative) as a primary source -- and to describe names inscribed on the edge -- as long as it can be referenced and checked by the average reader. But it is not permitted to speculate on those names as being "possibly" or "probably" someone. For each of the names, it will be necessary to cite it to a particular photograph as a reference. They can be added to a listing of something like The names of photographers annotated on negatives in the Chusseau-Flaviens photo collection include... If this cannot be done, than I am afraid that we will just have to wait until this information becomes published. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 07:33, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Chusseau-Flaviens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130203085827/http://www.eastmanhouse.org:80/collections/chusseau/chusseau-flaviens.xml to http://www.eastmanhouse.org/collections/chusseau/chusseau-flaviens.xml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:26, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Charles Chusseau-Flaviens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130312160539/http://image.eastmanhouse.org/files/GEH_1978_21_01.pdf to http://image.eastmanhouse.org/files/GEH_1978_21_01.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.eastmanhouse.org/collections/chusseau/chusseau-flaviens.xml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)