 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chapman Cohen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061120091216/http://www.positiveatheism.org//tochcohn.htm to http://www.positiveatheism.org/tochcohn.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060601235815/http://www.infidels.org:80/library/historical/chapman_cohen/index.shtml to http://www.infidels.org/library/historical/chapman_cohen/index.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Marxism edit
I've restored a quote from an article discussing Cohen's science popularisation from a Marxist point of view. I think it's useful and interesting as one of the few independent discussions of his life and work, and contrary to the view of the person who has now removed it twice, it is careful to provide a balanced assessment of Cohen's position and doesn't make wild allegations. It should stay pending a fuller write-up of his life, work and standpoint. Dannyno (talk) 09:27, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
- I've put back the Stanley source in the bibliography after it was removed (accompanied by some personal abuse) by an anonymous editor on political grounds (they personally feel "Marxist" to be an insult, but of course their personal feelings are not the point of wikipedia). The particular quote from the article (which is from the perfectly reputable source Minerva, a journal published by Springer) - which by the way I did not introduce into the article, as far as I remember - discussed Cohen's work in terms of socialist materialism, but without reaching wild conclusions. It seems to me that Cohen was not Marxist, but it also seems to me that it ought to be possible to discuss whether he was or was not and that such discussions could reasonably be included in this article. However, maybe the particular quote was not the most helpful one. --Dannyno (talk) 22:58, 8 January 2017 (UTC)