Talk:Chapel of Sacred Mirrors

Latest comment: 10 months ago by Skyerise in topic Conflicts of interest and primary sources

sources

edit

google newsgoethean 00:47, 14 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 15 November 2018

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved (page mover nac) Flooded with them hundreds 17:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply


The Chapel of Sacred MirrorsChapel of Sacred MirrorsWP:DEFINITE (and thank you; wow, that was fast!) 209.209.238.149 (talk) 12:16, 14 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:23, 15 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Conflicts of interest and primary sources

edit

Conflict of interest

edit

More than seven percent of the edits on this article are from Alexgreycosm (talk · contribs), who has referred to Alex Grey, the proprietor of the Chapel of Sacred Mirrors, in the first person in his edit summaries on Alex Grey.

Eight percent of edits on this article are from JonRHanna (talk · contribs), who is the author of one of the ten works referenced in this article, which, suspiciously, seems flattering and is not linked.

But neither has edited the article since 2015 so you're a bit late to the party, aren't you? Skyerise (talk) 23:40, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Primary sources

edit

Works by Grey himself are cited at least four times in this article. The CoSM's website is cited three times. Another citation is to their own Kickstarter campaign. That means at least half of the references are to primary sources. The remaining citations would be very difficult to verify because they are not linked, are dead links and/or are not properly formatted. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 22:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

The subject is notable and has been reported on by The New York Times. It seems unfortunate that the titles of the articles were not included here... Skyerise (talk) 23:40, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Denniscabrams: This problem has been corrected. 6 of 8 sources are now independent of the subject, and 5 additional but as yet unused independent sources are listed as further reading, including recent New York Times and Rolling Stone articles. Skyerise (talk) 00:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply