Talk:Chameleon (Helloween album)

Concept Album?

Chameleon is definitely not a concept album, I am making this judgement based on the unrelated lyrics and the statements made by Weikath in the expanded edition's interview (the three main song-writing band members had almost no collaboration). I'm going to remove the statement. If someone has proof from somewhere, they should put it back up, but with a citation (kudos to whoever noted the lack of a citation). Xanofar (talk) 23:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Background section reads like a review

Hardly objective and with a lot of (attitude fueled text enclosed like this). Could someone improve the section to make it more neutral. Some citations would be nice too.--TheHande (talk) 11:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Chameleon (Helloween album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Article requirements: Y All the start class criteria Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details Y At least one section of prose (excluding the lead section) Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians Y Categorisation at least by artist and year Y A casual reader should learn something about the album. Andrzejbanas (talk) 05:23, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Article lacks complete listing of "technical" personnel as set out at =amg&sql=10:diftxqthld0e~T2 AMG. Also, to meet the more rigorous criteria of the revised B class, this article needs improved sourcing to help readers verify the accuracy of information. Additional improvements may also be necessary. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Assessment for additional information on B class in album articles. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:16, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 14:28, 4 July 2011 (UTC). Substituted at 11:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Non-encyclopedic tone

Much of this article seems to be written more like a blog post or similar than an encyclopedia article. A lot of it needs to be rewritten. Liassica (talk) 15:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)