Talk:Cathy Hobbs

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


Untitled edit

This article cites no sources, and appears to be little more than the resume of the article subject. Furthermore, it does not establish the notability of the subject. The previous user "PhilKnight" is correct that the article is too promotional.

But we love Cathy Hobbs ! ! !

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Aporco68 (talkcontribs) 22:53, 21 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Emmy winner? edit

If she has won 5 Emmy awards, surely that would have generated more news coverage than the hits from this Google News search? -- John of Reading (talk) 10:12, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Cathy Hobbs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:49, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply